JAYSON KEELING: CITY ALL OVER!


Jayson Keeling knows how to make a photograph sparkle, and he knows how to make it last. Jayson has spent his working life perfecting how to get what he wants from behind a camera, his gentle demeanor belying a firm sense of direction and control. Passing through the worlds of hip-hop, fashion, porn and elsewhere, an innate belief in the image serves him like a compass. Raised between the Bronx and Jamaica, he now lives and works in Brooklyn. Lately he’s been exhibiting photographs alongside paintings made with glitter, text and debris, each of which is like a skeleton wearing a dirty sequin dress in close-up.

Portraits of Jayson (and Brownie) shot for EVB by Paul Mpagi Sepuya


Sam McKinniss:
Let’s talk about the title of your current show at Third Streaming, See Jungle! See Jungle! Go Join Your Gang, Yeah. City All Over! Go Ape Crazy. I really like that song, the Bow Wow Wow song.

Jayson Keeling: It’s an amazing song.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Sam: Obviously it has something to do with your imagery.

Jayson: It does have to do with my imagery. I chose the title because it synthesized a lot of different things about my practice—my exploration of my own culture, my own Jamaican heritage, and a personal search for ritual. In a parallel way that Malcolm McLaren brought a kind of tribal style to the punk/pop/new wave scene. That’s a strange connection to make. I don’t consider Jamaica tribal, but it’s OK. It’s tricky.

Sam: It’s tricky in a good way. Maybe it has to do with you being back and forth between New York and Jamaica.

Jayson: That’s correct.

Sam: Richard Hell says, “If you just amass the courage that is necessary, you can completely invent yourself. You can be your own hero...” That was his message to the New Wave. When I look at your work, I get this similar kind of thrill of self-invention.

Jayson: Continuous re-invention.


Sam:
Yeah, or just being in charge. I get some sort of thrill that you know what you’re doing.

Jayson: Considering that I’ve been producing work for over 20 years, thank you. In many ways the work is autobiographical. Basically what’s in the work touches on many aspects of my life. The time I spent working in the porn industry, the gay post-hip-hop porn videos. And then at the same time I produced images for magazines like BlackBook and Tokion and the New York fashion/editorial portrait scene. And also at the same time in the film industry as well as personal projects in Jamaica. All of this spanned 1992–2005 or 2006, which is when I committed to the art world and gave up on those pursuits. Everything touches on the various things I did over that extended period of time.

Sam: But everything you’ve done is all image, which is great.

Jayson: Yes.


Sam: So much fashion, so much porn, so much of the imagery that we take in is about self-invention, self-styling. The fashion world is still really potent for you.

Jayson: It is. When I speak about the fashion industry, for me it’s not really about a shoe or a belt or a handbag. It’s about fashion as anthropology, fashion as the ritual, the ritual of pain, and a transition rite for young people. If you think about the relationship between a great many people, Man Ray and fashion, Edward Steichen, Elsa Shiaparelli and her surrealist clothing, Balenciaga and his sculptural works. There’s definitely a lot of exchange. Those are the points of focus, those are my interests, but like most things I take the essence, the aura and the mechanisms. My intention was never to be literal.

Sam: One of the things I was thinking about while at your show was Gordon Parks and how he goes in and out of these worlds too.

Jayson: The interesting thing about Gordon Parks is he’s never really mentioned. You wouldn’t know that he existed—and a great many other photographers. There’s always that amazing picture he took of Gloria Vanderbilt. The fact that he’s a black man published in Vogue and Harper’s Bazaar—

Sam: But you think about him?

Jayson: Of course. Absolutely.

Sam: Maybe one of the reasons he doesn’t get talked about on the level that he should be placed is because he did so much, that he had so much material. The films—

Jayson: Shaft. Composing music, writing screenplays, photojournalism, fashion—

Sam: But I like that. You seem to have this poly-vocal, multi-tasking practice, too, that I think is exciting.

Jayson: For the Third Streaming show it really was important to bring it all together. That’s why certain juxtapositions are the way they are. The works are in dialogue. Forget about fashion—in general everything is in dialogue. It was important to allow viewers into my process—not that it’s solely about process. For me it’s really important that the process is completed in the mind of the viewer.
Sam:
I want to talk about one of the pictures, 'Mathias' [above]. It confirmed for me that reading art history is sexy. Do you agree?

Jayson: [laughs] Yes, I do. Especially Warhol when you get into the 'Sex Parts' series.

Sam: I don’t know about you, but when I read art history I skip to the sexy parts.

Jayson: Warhol’s history, or just in general?

Sam: All of it.

Jayson: [laughs] I take in whatever I can, wherever I can.

Sam: Who’s sexy in art history?

Jayson: Who comes to mind? Basquiat, of course. Actually I love everything about Patti Smith and her personal style. I think she’s sexy—scary sexy. I love Nina Simone, I love Prince, I love my fellow Geminis, I love George Clinton, I love Miles Davis. There are so many people. I definitely make the connection with their talent.

Sam: How do you choose models, or where do you meet them?
Jayson: It just depends. Most of my relationships—familiarity is really important. Obviously the guys I’ve worked with in porn, we had a relationship. In general, with most of them, I knew them for extended periods of time and they were used to me being there since I was the sole photographer shooting them, and photographing behind the scenes.

At a certain point this became really interesting because working between these three or four different fields, there was overlap. In hindsight, my practice was always the same. I functioned conceptually in the commercial photographic world. It’s a world where you define yourself, like the art world, with a particular style. My investment in my commercial work was a bit much. At a certain point it became too much. Toward the end of my commercial career I started to focus on photographing men, obviously, and the pictures became too sexualized. The folks I collaborated with, we started pushing the envelope, especially with black and Latino guys. I consider those images a really important body of work, because in a certain way, the models are participating as well. You can feel it and see it.

Sam: They’re not just paid models. You can tell that they like you.

Jayson: And I liked some of them! [laughs]

Sam: We need to talk about glitter. Your glitter paintings are totally tantalizing and hypnotic. How did you get to glitter? What do you see in glitter?

Jayson: I see so many things in glitter, then nothing at all. I needed a material that would glow when hit by light in the dark. That, and it’s like porn. I wouldn’t call it primal, but there’s a connection. It always makes people smile. It has built-in associations that people like, but it’s not really highly regarded and I like that as well.

Sam: Yeah, it’s not gold.

Jayson: Yeah, but at the same time it’s difficult to control, and difficult to deal with. Most of all, glitter for me is really about taking that thing that I learned from the fashion industry—the seduction and how to use it. You really participate with it. You can obscure things and play a bit.

Jayson's work is now on view at LegalArt in Miami through January 31,
and at Third Streaming in New York through February 25.

Upcoming shows include 'Next Generation' at Contemporary Wing Gallery, Washington DC
'tête-à-tête' at Rhona Hoffman Gallery, Chicago, Illinois, curated by Mickalene Thomas
'The Bearden Project' at The Studio Museum in Harlem, New York City



FROM THE ARCHIVES: PENNY ARCADE VS. BRUCE BENDERSON, APRIL 2009


When performance artist par excellence, former notorious Warhol actress, East Village anti-gentrification activist, downtown art archivist, and libidinal hurricane Penny Arcade came across my manifesto Toward the New Degeneracy, which deals with bohemia and the artistic avant-garde, she knew we were destined to meet.

Wish I’d shared the same intuition.

For more than two years, on the advice of certain (ex-)friends, I assiduously evaded the Exterminating Angel known as Penny, out of fear that my narcissism wasn’t strong enough to vanquish hers. I mean, who knew more about bohemia, the cultural history of New York, or the disastrous gentrification of the East Village than she? Meeting her might force me to take my 20-year-old gold-braided chip off my shoulder, despite my fondness for epaulettes (they were big in the '70s). Maybe I’d have to turn in my crown of thorns and relinquish to her my prickly throne as the Royal Crank of Anti-Establishment Rants.

Well, never, Mary.

But actually, I had a lot to worry about. Nobody can harangue, disturb, delight, and mesmerize a crowd by relentless complaint and irresistible humor like the divine Penny. After going to one of her shows, which pulls in everybody under 40 still living in the East Village and those now populating Brooklyn, I realized she had accomplished the impossible: making moralizing delightfully entertaining.

Penny’s keen critical mind never tires in its efforts to forge a social and artistic utopia in which women will be treated equally, artists will be recognized for their contributions, and critics will magically have good judgment as well as refrain from ass-kissing the powers that be.

Lots of luck, girl.

It was only when I decided to take the chance of meeting Penny that I realized I’d only seen one-half of the picture. Whether her politics leave me fuming or her social insights leave me cold isn’t really the issue. The issue - at least from my superficial faggy point of view - is that Penny is delightful company. No one, in fact, is quite so spunky, so quick on the draw, so generous, and so community-minded as this kinky graduate of New York’s grimy streets. She also has nice skin, decent tits and cheekbones, which is more than I can say - on all counts. And no one I’ve ever met has given faggotdom so much credit for the development of her vivid personality and artistic skills.

Having abandoned a conventional working-class Italian home and a conventional working class Italian name (Susan Ventura) to rub shoulders with drag queens the likes of Jackie Curtis and Margo Howard Howard, or underground-filmmaking homo madmen like Jack Smith, Penny Arcade has been on the New York scene since she was jailbait. During her early period of life on the streets, sarcastic, campy and sometimes downright mean faggots were her playful father surrogates. Can you imagine? From them she learned to value art, spit at the establishment, field irony and survive as an outsider.

Wherever there is a sexual deviant of note, Penny is not far behind. She was the mainstay of Quentin Crisp right until his death, sat at the wealthy bedside of Charles Henri Ford in the Dakota to the bitter end, is currently involved in a struggle to preserve the legacy of Jack Smith and has interviewed a host of artists, performers, and writers for her video archives, known as the Lower East Side Biography Project. If none of these names seems familiar, you’re probably under thirty and most definitely a ditz-ball. You need Penny (and me) to clue you in about the history of the ground upon which you walk. I probably wouldn’t bother, but Penny would.

So continue on to see what Penny had to say from Vienna when I skyped her from New York.
penny_1.jpg

Portraits of Penny Arcade by Jasmine Hirst

Bruce Benderson: Well, darling, can you hear this? Is it being broadcast through a speaker?

Penny Arcade: No. Only we can hear it.

Bruce: Then let me just noisily wolf down the rest of this pizza. As usual, I'm a big pig when it comes to you.

Penny: OK, then let me get a cigarette and I’ll be very happy, so hold on - nosh in peace.

[several moments later]

Bruce: I'm very interested in something you talked about in an essay you sent me, which was about snobbery and the class prejudice against you. I'd actually like to start there with our discussion, cause you know how interested and titillated I am by class issues.

Penny: Well, I think that because the 60s downtown art scene was so diverse, I never had any experience of class issues at first, because one of the things that happened in the mid to late 60s was a complete class collapse in certain circles.

Bruce: Yeah. At first it had a really positive effect because it allowed people from other classes to sneak into the scene.

Penny: Yes, absolutely, and mingle.

Bruce: Studio 54 was an excellent example. Although it was celebrity-minded, all sorts of lower class people were let in just for their bodies.

Penny:: That's right, that’s also when I started going to gay bars at the age of 14, and everybody was there.

Bruce: Yes, they used to be so eclectic.

Penny: Yes, used to be. So of course someone like me, who was a little working-class reform school girl, got snuck into gay bars in the early 60s in Hartford, Connecticut, and overheard conversations between, say, a mechanic who was into opera and the president of a bank who was into it, too.

Bruce: Did you have sex or love interests with any of these gabby homo culture vultures?

Penny: Yes.

Bruce: Was it frustrating or rewarding?

Penny: You have to remember that, classically, there’s a tremendous amount of sexual energy in a fag-hag relationship, it’s usually not just about wanting sex. There is a very strong erotic energy.

Bruce: I couldn't agree more, doll. Look at you and me.

Penny: [sighs] Yes, darling, and throughout my life I think it had less to do with people being gay or straight or bisexual than with the intensity of individual personalities bonding. At times they were able to surmount the big sexual difference of my not being a male.

Bruce: But you were never in a lovelorn position, or what one might describe as a masochistic situation?

Penny: No, because I figured it out quick. You may remember that I say in my show Bitch! Dyke! Faghag! Whore! that by the time I was 18, I’d stopped trying to fuck gay men. I’d caught on.penny_3.jpg

Bruce: OK, but let’s get back to class. When I think about that subject and you, I immediately think of two older gay men who you were very close to and for whom class was a big issue: Quentin Crisp and Charles Henri Ford. Crisp, especially, made strong class judgments, and although he liked to think of himself as culturally upper class, I think his judgments about the subject were typically petit bourgeois, if you'll allow me to make a class judgment. I wonder how you dealt with this or what your attitude about it was, because it always turned me off something terrible. I couldn’t stand Crisp.

Penny: Well, first of all, I accepted the fact that Quentin was very elderly, and that he was invariably tied to his upbringing. In a way, I think all of us tend to be, as we get older. We may have rebelled against certain things in our 20s, 30s, 40s and 50s, but we go a little bit in the other direction in our 60s, 70 and 80s.

Bruce: Crisp was petit bourgeois by background, I think.

Penny: One of the things I noticed in the last ten years of his life was that he was far more middle class than he thought he was.

Bruce:Uh huh. I gave him my first book, Pretending to Say No, and he was scandalized by what he called the “obscenity” in it. He associated libido with obscenity, and with a lower class mentality, and he was against it.

Penny: This issue is a very sensitive one because Quentin is somebody who was very, very damaged by his early sexual life. He was very, very romantic as a young person, and I think that the coarseness of the situations he found himself in... Well, that’s probably why he identified with women so strongly, because he had this kind of romantic idea and would find some guy and then it would be just about sex and the romantic part of him was never addressed.

Bruce: So his revenge was to judge these people in a negative way as lower-class types?

Penny: I think that sex was just a horror for him

Bruce: How come?

Penny: Well, I'm sure it was because he was being paid for sex, and he was the bottom and had to accept whatever the person wanted. Mentally he was in rebellion against it, but emotionally I think he was quite masochistic and felt that was all he deserved. He was very conflicted. He was someone who never had great sex.

Bruce: And you really feel this led to all his harsh judgments about class?

Penny: Well, not about class but anything connected with sex. At the end of his life he would continuously say, “Penny Arcade is only interested in sex,” and I thought that was such a weird take on me, because clearly that's not true. But that was his interpretation of everything that he saw in me at that time. He was really all about propriety and politeness and, unfortunately, to a certain degree, his regard for people operated on a real surface level, it was about being polite. At the end of his life, I was one of the few people who actually knew how much money he had. Two months before he died, I said, “Listen, don’t you want to make some kind of provision for elderly gay people over 75 or something like that? Because this was at a time when the East Village was really changing and people were being pushed out of their homes, and there was no money for lawyers. He was absolutely against it, and his response was, “If we all got what we deserved we would starve to death!.”

Bruce: OK, despite what Quentin thought about your sexuality, it’s certainly an important aspect of you. Because I know you’re interested in Reich and his theories.

Penny: I started doing Reichian therapy in 1983 and had the opportunity to work with Dr. Jorge Stolkiner, a Reichian doctor from Argentina, a country where the work is very close to what Reich himself practiced. The first time I went to see him he said only a couple of things, and one of the things he said just by looking at me, and it was, “You probably work in the sex industry.” I was completely shocked, because at that time I did. I was flabbergasted that he could see that in character analysis, just by looking at my face.

Bruce: Well, darling, what were you wearing?

Penny: No, it wasn't the way I was dressed, I was always dressed, you know, casually. But the point was that I was very intrigued by this. Reich understood that armoring takes place in the body because of fear, and I've always been very sexual, from the time I was a child. I've been knowingly bisexual since I was five. My fantasies were always about girls and boys, and I had a very active sexual imagination, and many of these things I’d imagined actually existed, I was later to find out. In Bitch! Dyke! Faghag! Whore! there’s a little girl section where she talks about tying up other little girls and spanking them in the basement. And all the little boys would come in and pee and we would cook with it, and all that sort of thing.

Bruce: They’d pee and you’d cook. I'm sure you didn't use one material for the other activity?

Penny: Yes, we did, absolutely. They wouldn't let us run the garden hose, and you can't cook without water. The boys would run in and out all day saying, “Need any pee?” and we'd say yes.

Bruce: And did you eat what you’d cooked?

Penny: No.

Bruce: I want to talk with you about Warhol, as I've been thinking a great deal - negatively - about him. I've even been thinking about writing about him, and I’m very interested in your take. Not only about what his aesthetic really was, but about what his motives really were, his modus operandi... and that really relates to everything we've already talked about so far. Not only sex, but class. Because what a few others and I have noticed is that, at least during the beginning of his career, when he achieved all his notoriety, it was people from working class backgrounds who were attracting all the attention for him. In fact, he himself was from a lower class immigrant background, and yet he seems to have abandoned it even though it was at the foundation of his success. So could you talk about that?

Penny: Well, in fact, I just went to this symposium in Columbus, Ohio, connected to this big exhibition at the Wexler Center.

Bruce: Oh, was Bibbe Hanson there? I simply adore her! She has that je ne sais quoi, don’t you think?

Penny: [mocking Bruce’s fake tone] Yes, I do, dahling. But, no, she was in Germany for some reason. I was really disappointed because I was looking forward to spending time with her, she's very fabulous. Anyway, it was one of the most interesting Warhol shows I've ever seen. The way it was mounted put very little distance between the viewer and the work. It was just unbelievably well-designed, but unfortunately it’s only going to be shown at the Wexler - and somewhere in England. Anyhow, I looked at the exhibit with John Giorno and Taylor Mead. You couldn't have two better people to see that exhibit with.

Bruce: I'm glad Taylor is still mobile.

Penny: Yes, he was, we were wheeling him around.

Bruce: Oh.

Penny: Yes, he's had a bit of a stroke and it’s affected his balance. But you know, he is 84 and he has a marvelous mind, and of course both he and John knew Warhol from very early on. They knew him starting in 1961 or something.

Bruce: But you knew him, too, didn't you?

Penny: Yes, but I met him after he was shot, which was a whole other thing. But what I wanted to say was that when I first came to New York, the first scene I was involved in was this very heavy-duty downtown drug scene of amphetamine addicts, and most of them were the people who populated The Factory.penny_4.jpg

Bruce: And most of them were from lower class backgrounds, I’d like to add.

Penny: They were all from lower class backgrounds, and Andy actually created The Factory for Ondine. Andy was a voyeur, and he was extremely drawn to this kind of criminal underground scene. Years ago, about 1997, I went with Victor Bockris to an exhibit about Warhol. It was about at the same time as the big retrospective on Jack Smith at PS1. They were kind of dueling exhibits at one point, and they had these vitrines with Andy's clothes in them, his leather jacket and his Marseilles sailor jersey and black boots. And I looked at it with Victor, who wrote the best biography of Warhol, and I said, "Oh my God, Andy was so into Jean Genet! All those gay guys from the 50s and 60s, you know, Jean Genet was their hero, his rough trade, criminal thing; and Victor's eyes popped open wide. 'You've just hit the nail on the head,” he said, “I never thought of that before. In fact, when I first approached Andy and wanted to do the biography of him, his first response was, "Why do you want to do a biography of me, why don't you do one on somebody interesting, somebody like Jean Genet?'"

Bruce: Let me add a thought. Really, his entire formula is very typical of exploitation, he’s somebody from the lower classes - who of course absorbed what he saw, some relative or certain working class social or cultural situations that were either sordid or energetic or ill-intentioned. And I think he repressed his connection to all of it. But because you can never get rid of these things, he then chose people on the outside world to act out these conflicts, to act out his closeness and connection to working class mentalities. But because he himself wasn’t admitting a connection to it, it became a kind of exploitation.

Penny: Well, yes, Andy was from an immigrant background, and I'm from an immigrant background, too. When you grow up in 1940s America like him, or 1950s America like me, you really are The Other, if you know what I mean. So Andy was upwardly mobile, he was the first person in his family to go to college, he came to New York, he kind of patterned himself on Truman Capote, a kind of dandy, who was somewhat intellectual and very faggy. He was ultra-dandy-faggy... with his bowties...

Bruce: If you compare what you did as an artist with your immigrant background to what Andy did with his immigrant background, the difference is that you owned it, expressed it, and analyzed it. Andy Warhol never got up there and said, “I'm from a working class Czech background, my relatives worked in factories.” It had to be found out about him.

Penny: I absolutely agree, but I mean, look, the guy was a super-hard worker, and by 1960 he was wealthy. Once he achieved this kind of financial success and acceptance, he then started to get voyeuristic… Whenever Ondine would see Andy, he’d say, “Get that guy out of here, he gives me the creeps.”

Bruce:But he had a need for his voyeurism because it represented what he had rejected in himself.

Penny: Yes. In my early conversations with Andy, probably one of the reasons why my relationship with him didn't develop more depth was that my immediate thing was to talk about us both being from working class and immigrant backgrounds. The town that I come from is all Eastern European Catholics: Polish, Lithuanian, Ukrainian. And Andy reminded me of all the people I knew in my hometown, some of whom lived there with their mothers because they were gay, and went to mass on Sundays, etc. Bringing this stuff up to Andy made him really nervous.

Bruce: But don’t you resent his exploitation attitude, not owning himself what he used voyeuristically, using others to act it out and profiting from it?

Penny: No.

Bruce: Well, I do.

Penny: Well, I don't resent him for it. Here's a funny story, did you ever know Herndon Ely? She was in the Playhouse of the Ridiculous at the end of the 60s. I knew her there. She was an East Village figure, an amazing artist, a speed freak, you know. She had a long relationship with Dorothy Podber, and Dorothy was the sidekick of Ray Johnson, a big speed freak, big meth amphetamine person. And all the speed freaks of the 60s of that circle were massively creative, they were all amazing artists. Dorothy was ill for a long time. She was 75 when she died. Within a very, very short time Herndon died, and I don't know under what circumstances, but I had seen Herndon July 15th, when I had left for Europe on my birthday. At any rate, I was greatly saddened to hear about Herndon’s death. It was a big shock to me and I decided to google Dorothy Podber. This is like some really obscure East Village figure. Well low and behold, there is this obituary in the New York Times... and it talks about her relationship with Ray Johnson, and the happenings and how they used to go about terrorizing people as an art form. But there's also an interesting little story about how she had gone up to The Factory in 1963, and there were a bunch of 'Marilyn's' sitting around and she said to Andy, “Oh, can I shoot them?” and Andy said, “Sure, go ahead.” So she took out a gun and shot a stack of four of them between the eyes. Andy flipped out and said to Billy Name, “Get Dorothy out of here and please don't bring her here again, she really scares me.”

Bruce: Did he think she was going to shoot them with a camera?

Penny: Yes! But what I thought about was the first foreshadowing of somebody shooting a Warhol and of somebody shooting Andy. And as for the original Factory, I heard about it when I was on the Lower East Side in all those shooting galleries, because a lot of those people who were coming through these dark, dank shooting galleries that I was crashing in as a 16- or 17-year-old were also hanging out at The Factory. You know, Andy used lots of speed, and he surrounded himself with these quite dangerous people. But I never experienced Andy as exploiting anybody. I think people were exploiting him while Andy was exploiting them; it was a two-way street.

Bruce: It was one big happy exploitation party!

Penny: Yes.

Bruce: This is my last question: I feel that a lot about your performance and your value as an artist has to do with the cult of personality. Your art, in a large way, has to do with your personality in a very unmediated way, and that’s the first thing I'd like you to tell me about. Then as a corollary I'd like to know why you think you are important, why you think your cultural voice is important.

Penny: Well, first and foremost, I never thought I was going to be an artist, even all the time I was making art. My goal was to live an artistic life, I thought I could do that. I've always been a great performer, ever since I started performing. I’m charismatic, I have a lot of energy, I have timing - all the things that are important when you perform. When I was in my twenties, I really felt like there was something I wanted to express. But I didn’t know what it was, and I ended up taking lots of time living in other cultures. The thing is, I've always been a storyteller. I’ve always been a person with lots of experiences and I've wanted to talk about them. So, fundamentally, when I started making my own work, it happened totally accidentally, out of telling stories about what had just happened to me or what someone had just said to me. And one day I was on Avenue A telling somebody a story about Dame Margot Howard Howard, you know, the famous junkie drag queen, and as I was telling the story I suddenly had the sense, “Wow, I could do this on stage. Being Southern Italian, I come from a storytelling tradition, and all through my childhood the stories being told around the kitchen table were definitely more interesting than Bonanza or anything else on television, so I come from that background. I also come from the bad blood of the family, you know. I turned 14 in juvenile detention, then got put into a soft-core reform school.

Bruce: Hot. Did you have a nice party?

Penny: No. It was me getting my period on an iron bed in the Hartford House of Detention. That was my birthday. Here's the point: I’ve always had a peculiar point of view, and I think artists report from the edge of society. Only outsiders can speak to the whole because they are outside it. That’s how far it goes with my unmediated voice. Around 1976-77, I was living in Maine, and there was this odd-job store in the middle of nowhere, and once I found a whole bunch of discounted copies of Lou Reed’s Metal Machine Music there. It was a completely instrumental screeching thing. Of course, I knew that Lou Reed had been involved with all these speed freaks I had known, so I bought one for a dollar and brought it home and said to myself, “This album is for the people who have no music, and I’m a voice for people who have no voice.”

Bruce: So this is political for you, this is almost like a crusade to give these voiceless people a voice.

Penny: Kenneth Bernard, the theater playwright and academic, wrote an introduction to the new book about and by me to be published by Semiotext(e), and he made a very interesting point by saying, “Arcade is a reformer,”....and I am.
penny_2.jpg

STUART SANDFORD GETS PHYSICAL

In 2012, multimedia artist and occasional EVB contributor Stuart Sandford will be embarking on a yearlong project to become a bodybuilder. We caught up with Stuart in the locker room of his local gym to coax a couple self-portraits showing his current physique, and to find out what this project was really all about!

Richard Welch: Why?

Stuart Sandford: The project is about two things. Firstly, it's an extension of my existing work documenting the male form. That work has always been about asking questions concerning identity, sexuality and masculinity, ideas that are formed during adolescence. Secondly, it's a critique of the current state of public arts funding in the UK, specifically relating to the massive divergence of Arts Council funding to the upcoming Olympic games in London that has been happening for a number of years now, not to mention the cuts to the arts under the current coalition government.

Richard: How would you describe your body shape now? What are your stats?

Stuart: Right now my body is OK. Although I haven’t actually been to the gym for about six months I was hitting it pretty hard before that and my body was probably in the best shape of its life at that time. As you can see, it isn’t now. At the moment I’m 163 pounds, which is low for my height, I’m 6’1, and I have a body fat of just under 12%, which is pretty good.

Richard: What stats are you aiming for?

Stuart: I’m aiming for around 200 pounds with a body fat of about 6%. So I won’t be getting HUGE but you’ll certainly be able to tell I’ve been spending more time in the gym than the average bloke. I’ll probably look more like an athlete than, say, a bodybuilder.

Richard: Are you concerned about your health during and after this project?

Stuart: Well, I’ve been researching various training methods and nutritional approaches for over a year and I’m going to be working with a highly qualified team of trainers and nutritionists so I have no concerns over my physical health. Mentally I’m quite looking forward to the routine I’ll have to adopt, something I don’t really have in my everyday life as an artist. Oh and one thing that I want to make absolutely clear is that I won’t be using any steroids or performance enhancers whatsoever throughout the project. It’s going to be a totally natural approach.

Richard: How often do you plan on working out?

Stuart: Between three and six times a week, depending on what I need to focus on at the time. It’ll change as the project progresses and what my body can take or needs at the time.

Richard: Once you reach your goal what then for your body?

Stuart: The idea is to compete in a number of sporting and athletic events, and that includes a bodybuilding contest that will be held in April of 2013, so I’ll need to keep it up until then. After that, it’ll be back on the burgers and beer. Joke.

Richard: Do you have a soft spot for beefcakes?

Stuart: Not particularly, although I have noticed over the last couple of years that my tastes have definitely matured and I’m no longer as interested in twinks as I used to be. It’s all about the face with me anyway, but I definitely prefer a more masculine man that I used to. I draw the line at a hairy back though.

Richard:
Do you wrestle?

Stuart:
Not since I was a kid, but I’ll be doing some as part of the project.

Richard: Is this just an excuse to wear a weightlifter's spandex singlet?

Stuart: [laughs] Totally! Forget the answer to the first question.

Richard: How can people help you raise the funds to complete this project?

Stuart:
I’ve produced a few new works that I’m selling through my online store to raise funds for the project. The entire budget for the project, which is around $47,000, will be made up of grants, sponsorship and sales of work.

As any good gym buddy will tell you, if you want that extra push on the weight bench you need a motivating soundtrack, or a solid shot of Creatine. We know Stuart won't be getting involved in any testicle shriveling shenanigans so we asked him to give us his workout mix. PUSH!!

EVB Get Physical - Stuart Sandford Mix [download] link fixed!

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Glass Candy - Introduction / Bill Conti - Gonna Fly Now / Miami Horror - Bellevue /  Salt-N-Pepa - Push It /  Technotronic - Pump Up The Jam / Depeche Mode - Personal Jesus (Pump Mix) / Van Halen - Jump / Disco D - Move Ya Body Dubplate / Survivor - Eye of the Tiger / Tears For Fears - Everybody Wants To Rule The World / Rockers Hi-Fi - Push Push (M.A.N.D.Y. Pusher Remix)

CHRISTIAN SCHOELER: SKIN AND SOLIPSISM


We first interviewed the emerging German born artist Christian Schoeler back in 2009, after recently completing his MA. Today he is represented by The Urs Meile Gallery, the same gallerist as Ai Weiwei, and his work is held by the worlds' major collections, both public and private. He recently returned to Germany following six months as the Artist in Residence at the Urs Meille Gallery in Beijing. We decided it was high time we caught up with Christian to check out what he's been up to.

Portraits of Christian shot for EVB by Malcom Pate

Richard Welch: Your work is frequently framed by a book, a song or some other formal concept. Where does your current exhibition title/concept Pussy, King of the Pirates come from?

Christian Schoeler: It’s the title of the last novel from American experimental novelist Kathy Acker. She was a radical traditionalist—I really like this idea; it's something I really believe in for myself. You know, when she was a kid, the only thing she wanted to become was a pirate. In my opinion, this also means having fun and being wild and free. Like a darkly romantic Peter Pan. Kathy Acker not only pushed and broke literary conventions, she constantly challenged social standards and structures and exposed the abuse of power and the exercise of control at work in modern society.

One of her heroes was Michel Foucault, and one of Foucault's proposals was that we were moving away from a society of discipline to a society of control, and that all hierarchical structures were evolving to resemble Bentham's panopticon—an architectural design where the big-shots could watch the small-fry without the small-fry knowing. Maybe this is the case with the subjects in my paintings. When Karin Dreijer Andersson sings "We had a communist in the family/I had to wear a mask", is she then a communist?
Richard: Did you feel isolated during your residency in Beijing—perhaps because of the language barrier? How did it inform your work?

Christian: Sure, Beijing is probably the only metropolis where it's pretty tough getting by in every situation with just English. So you're always relying on others for help, which they give quite quickly.

But what was actually more interesting than the language barrier was not being able to connect to other people in our daily, non-verbal ways. In China, for various reasons, I thought long and hard about sociopathy and narcissism, and this sneaky snake-like mechanism of isolation and self-isolation, which eventually turns into a crisis, or insanity, or a modus operandi that nobody understands anymore. I was intrigued by this game of reaction/counter-reaction, which grows like weeds, and which you can never explain—but which a narrative or a painting can.

But you know, isolation is also a question of negating, or destroying, which is also one way of trying to go beyond your 'self'. What I mean is, you have your existence, which can be arbitrary and lonely, and which you can balance out by connecting to other people. Learning how to relate to yourself or to other people is a basic need for almost everyone, and if you haven't learned how to be empathic then you can forget happiness. Love is ultimately the only way to really connect to the world without losing your integrity or individuality. When you love someone, you merge with that person while keeping your 'self' and your feeling of being a separate entity. Also, Mr. Big Fat Ego quiets down so much that the other person's needs and wants feel just as important as your own.

But of course you're going to miss the love boat if you're isolated in your own travesty, desperate to transcend, and so you negate and you destroy. The famous American convict George Jackson wrote from prison: "It may be that I am fleeing, but throughout my flight, I am searching for a weapon." So I believe that those condemned souls who can't go beyond themselves opt for the inferior alternative of transcendence, destruction instead of creation, the highway instead of a higher way. You reach happiness through creating, but destroying leads to suffering, primarily for the person destroying.

Richard: You mentioned before that your work centers on the pursuit of beauty, and that political or social commentary wasn't something you wished to express through your work. Has your time in China changed that at all?

Christian: No. But it has given me so much food for thought, art and painting. I experienced the in-your-face contrast between collectivism and individualism. No other country in Asia has been shaped by collectivism more than China. You'll find collective consciousness and behavior wherever you find close-knit, dependent ties to certain groups, i.e., family, work, circles of friends. Loyalty is number one and keeps all the other 1,349,570,702 numbers together. I don't even have to mention that this is the complete opposite of our cherished, beloved individualism. But we have all heard the diagnosis that individualism has been the symptom masking the deeper illnesses of dissociation and alienation from society, and we have all seen the golden, ethical ideal of autonomy turn into wooden iron: Find sanity! Fulfill yourself! You must! The sociopathological and dissocial behaviors that sparked off the financial crisis in the Western world aren't so much of a problem in a collective country like China.


Richard:
Your exhibition text refers to the lack of an "outside" in your work. What sort of reality do your subjects inhabit?

Christian: A narcissistic reality would be too easy. There is a big difference between care of the self and love of the self. They often get confused in the Greek myth of Narcissus, which is about the 'ego' or 'self'. Why did the goddess Artemis let that beautiful boy drown in his own reflection? Was it because she wanted to punish him for wanking in front of a mirror? No, it was because he rejected any man or woman who loved and wanted him, because he was incapable of connecting to another person. The genuine narcissist—and all the while feeding off of the care and praise from others.

Solipsism is much closer to the truths of my subjects. They are dreamers, without an outside, playing with the potential unreality of the external world as we conceive of it. Because, suddenly, something could go faster than light. But my subjects have bigger metaphysical fish to fry than knowledge. There is a big difference between 'knowing thyself' and 'taking care of the self'. In Foucault's care of the self, the first way to individuate yourself is through love. But the second is to fold the line of the self, to fold the outside with the inside. You can do this sexually, practically, politically, artistically.

So instead of imposing a world-as-it-really-is and a subject that can be located in space and time, I try to conjure and superimpose a parallel universe populated by phantoms and doubles flowing on surfaces which are flowing themselves. And when you're dealing with this kind of stuff, it isn't about true and false anymore, but about the virtual and the actual. I don't cherish the hope that this other possible world will one day be actualized. The ideal does not belong to this world; it must be alien, otherwise it wouldn't have any extra-being, it wouldn't be above reality. My art is inspired by my dreams. It isn't about the image of any kind of reality, or a type of portraiture.


Richard:
When we first interviewed you in 2009 you had just finished your MA, and you are now represented by Galerie Urs Meile, who is also known for discovering Ai Weiwei among many other major artists. How has the journey been?

Christian: I met Urs Meile through my German gallerist, and discoverer, Christa Schuebbe. I was lucky, Christa Schuebbe is probably the most experienced gallerist in Germany (which is why we call her BossLady). BossLady introduced me to Swiss gallerist and artist manager Urs Meile in 2010. It was a tough time, and the art market, with its celebrity cult, skyrocketing prices, and fetishisms, has been difficult for me to deal with. Finding a partner like Urs Meile who is proficient in this business, who can oversee all aspects, and who can accompany me on such a journey, has been very important. My work is more than just me. It's too easy and naive to think that you can start on a journey like this all by yourself. I'm hardly ever on my own—it's teamwork.
Richard:
Your work has evolved a lot over the last few years to expand beyond realistic portraiture and contexts into something deeper and more complex. What has changed about your approach and agenda?

Christian: There's a shared misconception that my work is still about portraiture, however in the catalog text to the exhibition this is described this as a superficial reading. And I think it's right. Portraiture is supposed to represent a person through his individual properties, and it kind of works like a memorial to that person. But what I'm interested in is the surface of the models. This thin, incorporeal mist which emanates from their bodies, and the film which envelops them. I'm trying to isolate the models' bodies in these undifferentiated recesses, in these excessive palpitations in which they're trapped, and I believe that these recesses and palpitations get to work only when they've been enveloped in surfaces. Paul Valéry hit the philosophical nail on the head when he said, "It is the skin that is the deepest".

I want to draw the person out and away from their properties. And then just maybe the painting can become the incorporeal double or the phantom of the model. All of this can happen when the hand guides the brush and brings form and light and masses of color into balance, as well as sense and nonsense, creating a singular event—an echo made from fortuitous swabs and lines.
Richard:
Your work isn't overly sexual or erotic, but somehow it's often both.

Christian: I would like to know if eroticism has lost its etymology and been orphaned from Eros. In the Western world it's difficult to mix love with raw sexuality, or to reduce love down to pure sensuality. Like Warhol, sex has become too abstract for me! But is it possible to separate Eros from sensuality, corporeality and sexuality at all—artistically speaking? I don't think you can, since art and eroticism are always coupled together. There are double movements at work here which you have to suss out. The aesthetic always smacks of the erotic, and vice versa, the erotic always smacks of the spirit of art. Even an art that has vetoed any and every representation of sexuality reeks of something erotic, and vice versa, sex will always be groping towards form and aesthetics. Erotic cravings crave aesthetics, and aesthetic rapture before a work of art can spiral into intense passions and therefore into the erotic.

Richard: Your work has always focused on that quality that many artists (and art collectors) trivialize, undervalue, and generally dismiss: BEAUTY. What's your point-of-view about the marginalization of one of the most visible attributes of your work?

Christian: I've always heard that the audience views my work as beads on the string of transient intimacy and the search for fragile beauty. You could say that these are characteristics of late 19th century art, you know, Rimbaud, Baudelaire—and then you can oppose the idealized notion of beauty to Baudelaire's ennui and existential boredom, as in his poetry in Spleen et Idéal. Beauty versus boredom—it's an interior and unclear conflict, like 'good' versus 'evil'. But beauty does get dumped in the same bag as kitsch and deceptive illusory idylls faster than you can say out-of-my-art-face. Especially in Germany.

Tackling concepts like beauty and imagination is one of the most radical things you can do as an artist these days. And you also have to walk the tightrope between taste and beauty. This tightrope has been stretched out thanks to the access to art production through free and international art markets. Beauty is two cents worth in that world. If you're committed to beauty, you come across as uncool or politically incorrect at best. To add insult to injury, idealized notions of beauty and imagination in art get heavily sidelined to museum and art-dealer product ranges. But then ugliness, roughness, true kitsch, idiosyncrasy, and even pedagogy widen the product range—and there's an almost endless supply of all that in countless studios for curators and gallerists to uncover.

Art has always had dealings with beauty. The autonomy of a work of art, its uselessness—this is beauty. When someone conceives a work of art, something new is brought forth into the world. The essence of beauty isn't just found in its illusion, but also in its existence. If this wasn't the case, then rummage tables with floral underwear in supermarkets would be more beautiful than secret, wild gardens, blossoming profusely somewhere, unseen by human eyes.
Richard: What was the best movie you watched this year?

Christian: Well, when you have to go to three different countries in six months to actively work and live, you don't really have the time or need to passively sit on your bottom and watch a movie. But speaking of sitting on bottoms, I did watch something really thought-provoking by Bel Ami. Actually, at one point they tried very hard to contract me to act in one of their films, but as I was contracted by Louis Vuitton at the time it really wasn't possible to do both simultaneously—unfortunately.

Richard: What are your plans for 2012?

Christian: I'm currently showing some work at Art Basel Miami and Pulse, and I'm really looking forward to my first solo show at Mendes/Wood in São Paolo, Brazil. At the moment I'm working on a new body of work for this exhibition. I'm calling it All Hail Curly Kale With Me Above the Clouds.



©2008, 2009, 2010 East Village Boys. All Rights Reserved. Legal Disclaimer
Real Time Analytics